Sometimes we encounter
(apparently) paradoxical situations in which people behave in way that is
(apparently) counterintuitive. Let me give you some examples to better
understand.
1. Despite thefact that 30 people witnessed a bad thing (e.g. theft or aggression) no one intervened.
2. Despite the
fact that these people barely have money for food, they buy expensive “flashy”
things like iPhones or designer-brand clothes.
4. Despite the
bad weather in The Netherlands, the agriculture (particularly growing vegetables)
is highly developed.
5. Despite he
was a nice guy, he did something really bad.
8. Despite
having more money than they can spend, rich people are stingy (the opposite of
generous).
9. Despite not
having high athletic (sport) performance footballers get a lot of media
coverage.
The
interesting thing about all these (apparent) paradoxes is that in fact it is
not “Despite ….” It is BECAUSE. In a series of posts I’ll try to briefly
explain why it is not Despite, but Because.
No comments:
Post a Comment